My rebuttal…
As my regular readers will remember, I was bombarded with comments from a bunch of British schoolgirls last month sticking up for their teacher’s idiotic decision to protest against WHSmith selling Playboy stationary. I must admit, these girls’ comments were both unexpected and welcome due to my amusement over their horrible spelling, naive knowledge of sex and unfounded insults.
Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to reply to the girls because, although many of them had MSN Spaces, they had not made their spaces public. I did, however, find a girl who commented on my site and who has since publicized her space. Her name is Juli (aka. Jeong Ji-Hoon) and after reviewing her space and re-reading her comment, I have decided to reply both on my own space as well as hers.
I will reply to her comment in sections to better break down her argument:
“Ok I go to coloma too and Miss Kirwan is my teacher. I fully understand where she is coming from. She just doesn’t want porn brands to sell their products on young children. Hate to break it to you but even though our school is called Coloma Convent, there are currently no nuns at coloma. Just because we are Catholics, we should not be discriminated by idiotic people such as yourself. The fact that we are Catholic has no reflection on what we think, just because we do think that porn brands should not be sold to young children, this does not mean that we all need to go to Ann Summers, which i presume is your favourite shop. Am i correct? ”
My dear child. I hate to break it to you, but I am also a Catholic. I also went to Catholic school from primary through to secondary school and I too had no teachers who were nuns. Simple mistake… my high school was called a high school, while yours is called a convent.
Although raised in the Catholic community, I do not concur with Ms Kirwan’s decision to punish WHSmith instead of the parents responsible for the children buying the stationary. Parents should have more involvement in what their children are buying and the school should notify the parents whether they wish to ban such products from school premises, but not take the fight up with the bookstore. Since the products are non-ponographic, they need not be taken off the shelves… the responsibility lies on the teens at your school and their paying parents.
Just because a person is Catholic doesn’t mean they will agree with Ms. Kirwan and your assessment of the situation. I know many Catholics who would disagree with you on this subject. I think that perhaps you misunderstand the word ‘discrimination’ because I was not discriminating against Catholics in my commentary, I was discriminating against people who decide they know what is best for others. I still stand by my statement that your teacher needs to get a life instead of inflicting her beliefs on others.
As for you calling me idiotic… I shall forgive you for your lack of self-control in calling people names… I will excuse it as being your angst-ridden age. You probably lash out at others simply because you are unhappy with yourself.
“So you are a size 6, what is your point? The article clearly refers to the playboy girls, oh wait, you must be one! I mean after all you do know many of the playboy traits.. May i just say that clearly from your picture anyone can tell that you are probably an employer of Hugh Heffner. Is he good in bed? Or is his dick too big for you? Maybe you like wearing the bunny outfits and going around in a skimpy bikini but others actually have morals and what people nowadays know as dignity. If you don’t know what this word means, by all means go on www.dictionary.com.”
Thank you for the kind link, kiddo, but I am well acquainted with that web site and often enjoy sending the link to naive children such as yourself.
Yes, I am a size 6. My point being that the women in Playboy magazine are definitely not a size 6 UK… although perhaps more like a size 6 US (size 12 UK). Your teacher said in the original article that women in Playboy are a size 6 and that this is a negative image to portray to young women. The problem with her statement was that it is not female porn stars in Playboy that are that size, but female models in popular teen magazines! Models are a size 6… porn stars are more buxom. I invite you to do research on this since I am confident that you will find Playboy bunnies to be more ‘Victorian’ than the average stick figure found in women’s magazines.
I noticed on your site that you want to lose weight and that you want to look like a model… perhaps the insults you throw my way are out of jealousy.
As for my current employment; I presently work for a United Nations foreign office… if you don’t believe me I can refer you to many different web sites that prove my identity. I can assure you that my curriculum vitae is quite impressive.
You are right about one thing, though, I really would like to get my hands onto a vintage Playboy bunny suit!
“oH.. I just read the post below. Strip class eh.. Hugh really paying you that much? So you want to be a good little girl for your master? Aww.. How sweet! Wow… You really must like being an employer, want to improve your skills eh? Make you seem more irrestible? Think about it, with all that money you make you can buy the whole playoby range of stationary at WHSmith! In conclusion to this, you need a job and by that i mean a REAL job, one that would look good on your cv.”
June 23 2:56 PM
Published by p_e_3_k_a_o_0_
(http://spaces.msn.com/members/randombabble/)
That’s right kiddo. I take strip dancing classes enjoy every class… Hugh doesn’t pay me at all, but the UN is paying me very well. As for being irresistible, just ask my boyfriend and my male companions before him… I’m sure they can all vouch for my sex appeal.
I haven’t bought any Playboy stationary because they weren’t selling it in stores when I was at university… I have, however, bought a Playboy t-shirt, vest, belt, bag, jewelery, hat and matching mittens.
I have a great job and a fabulous CV… you simply need a job to put on your CV. Grow up, get an education and get a job, then perhaps you can start debating appropriately with intellect instead of insult.